SAF Spolier (ENG)

PART 1 — SAF: EUROPE HAS MOVED FROM AMBITION TO OBLIGATION

The Market Is Now Created by Law

Sustainable Aviation Fuel is no longer simply an environmental aspiration or a voluntary airline commitment. In the European Union it has become a regulated fuel market.

Regulation (EU) 2023/2405 — ReFuelEU Aviation — requires aviation fuel suppliers at Union airports to incorporate progressively increasing quantities of Sustainable Aviation Fuel into the fuel they supply.

The statutory trajectory is clear:

These are not policy aspirations. They are minimum shares established under Article 4 and Annex I of Regulation (EU) 2023/2405. The Regulation is directly applicable across the European Union. (EUR-Lex⁠)

Within that obligation sits a further requirement for synthetic aviation fuels, rising from the 2030 period towards 35% of total aviation fuel by 2050. Europe is therefore deliberately creating more than one SAF production pathway rather than relying upon a single technology or feedstock. (EUR-Lex⁠)

The significance for Syngas Project is straightforward: Europe does not need to be persuaded that SAF will be required. The legislation has already created the requirement. The industrial challenge is now to produce enough compliant fuel, at scale, from sustainable feedstocks.

Why the Difference Between 1G and 2G Matters

Not every litre of renewable ethanol represents the same strategic resource.

First-generation ethanol is generally produced from agricultural crops containing readily available sugar or starch. It has established large-scale production routes, but those feedstocks sit within agricultural systems that may also produce food or animal feed.

Second-generation ethanol changes the proposition.

It can be produced from wastes, residues, non-food cellulosic material and lignocellulosic material rather than requiring the primary agricultural product itself.

EU renewable-energy legislation expressly recognises lignocellulosic material including biomass sourced from forests and recognises forestry residues including branches, pre-commercial thinnings, leaves, needles, tree tops, sawdust and cutter shavings among advanced biofuel feedstocks. (EUR-Lex⁠)

This is the territory occupied by TITAN.

TITAN does not begin with grain, sugar or vegetable oil. Its principal feedstock is sustainably sourced forest residue: material arising from normal forestry activity which is not the principal timber product.

That distinction becomes increasingly important as the SAF market expands.

There will be considerable 1G capacity. There will be HEFA capacity based upon lipids and waste oils. There will be synthetic e-fuels. All can contribute to European aviation decarbonisation.

But genuinely scalable biogenic, non-food, lignocellulosic feedstockoccupies a particularly valuable position because it allows renewable carbon already circulating within the biological economy to be converted into transport fuel without constructing the business around food crops.

That is the foundation of the TITAN → 2G Ethanol → AtJ SAF strategy.

The Castle Is Biogenic Carbon

The long-term value of TITAN is therefore not simply that it can manufacture ethanol.

The strategic asset is the ability to take controlled biogenic residue streams and convert them into a clean hydrogen-rich producer gas from which different products can subsequently be made.

Our principal SAF pathway is:

Forest Residue → Hydrogen Producer Gas → Targeted Microbial Fermentation → 2G Ethanol → Alcohol-to-Jet → SAF

The ethanol is therefore an intermediate energy carrier rather than the limit of the platform.

This matters because Syngas Project is not constructing an industrial system whose economics depend upon only one downstream molecule.

Before fermentation, TITAN produces hydrogen-rich producer gas. That gas can be directed between alternative biological and energy pathways.

Our principal commercial route can therefore be expressed more completely as:

Forest Residue → HPG → 2G Ethanol / Renewable Methane / Hydrogen + Biogenic CO₂ / CHP

The drawbridge does not only fall towards ethanol.

If the ethanol market, refinery programme, commissioning sequence or downstream offtake requires adjustment, TITAN retains the ability to swing producer gas towards renewable methane and energy production. The upstream conversion infrastructure therefore remains productive while the downstream market develops.

This flexibility is important for financing as well as engineering.

A conventional ethanol plant is fundamentally an ethanol plant.

TITAN is a biogenic carbon conversion platform in which 2G ethanol for SAF is the primary value route, but not the only route.

Why Europe Did Not Feel the SAF Transition Immediately

The ReFuelEU obligation began on 1 January 2025, initially at only 2%.

At almost exactly the same time, European energy security became dominated by much larger questions: natural gas supply, LNG, oil prices, geopolitical disruption, shipping routes and security of supply around the Middle East and the Strait of Hormuz.

Against those events, the first 2% SAF requirement was relatively small.

That can create the misleading impression that the SAF transition has stalled.

It has not.

The important number is not 2%.

It is the progression:

2% → 6% → 20% → 34% → 42% → 70%.

The industrial inflection becomes particularly significant between 2030 and 2035, when the mandated SAF share rises from 6% to 20%. (EUR-Lex⁠)

Plants being developed during the second half of this decade are therefore not principally being built for the 2025 market. They are being developed for the much larger structural requirement emerging through the 2030s and beyond.

TITAN and the proposed Syngas Project SAF East and SAF West refineries should be viewed against that timetable.

Building the Feedstock Position Before the Refinery Market Tightens

Our first responsibility is therefore to build TITAN.

As European 2G ethanol capacity develops, Syngas Project does not necessarily need to wait until every future TITAN is operating before building a wider market position.

Associated 2G ethanol producers across the Baltic–Central European–North Sea corridor can potentially become suppliers through long-term purchase and offtake structures.

This creates two complementary positions:

our own production capacity and contracted third-party 2G inventory.

Over time, Syngas Project can therefore aggregate compliant ethanol for delivery into SAF refining capacity serving both eastern and western European markets.

The objective is not merely to own individual plants.

It is to establish a biogenic carbon and 2G ethanol supply platformcapable of supporting successive SAF refining capacity as the European mandate rises.

SAF East and SAF West

Our long-term concept therefore places refining downstream of the TITAN network.

Two principal refinery positions are envisaged:

SAF East — supporting Poland, the Baltic region and the developing Central and Eastern European market.

SAF West — connecting western Poland with the German, Scandinavian and North Sea aviation-fuel markets.

Each refinery can grow as the upstream ethanol position grows.

The strategy is consequently modular:

TITAN One → TITAN network → aggregated 2G ethanol → SAF East / SAF West → expanding European SAF market.

This is fundamentally different from constructing a refinery first and subsequently searching for sufficient sustainable feedstock.

Syngas Project intends to build the feedstock system and the refinery system together.

A European Energy-Security Asset as Well as an Aviation Fuel Asset

There is one further characteristic of this model that is becoming increasingly relevant.

Distributed sustainable fuel production has strategic value.

Europe’s existing aviation-fuel system is concentrated around large refineries, major pipelines, ports and airports. Those assets are efficient, but concentration also creates vulnerability.

A network of smaller biogenic conversion facilities and regional SAF refineries introduces a different characteristic: distributed production close to indigenous feedstock, existing transport infrastructure and end users.

For Central Europe, the Baltics and Scandinavia, this could become significant beyond normal commercial aviation.

Modern European defence planning increasingly considers dispersed operations, alternative operating locations and the use of existing road and transport infrastructure as temporary operational platforms. Fuel logistics therefore become part of resilience.

This does not convert TITAN into a defence project.

It means that locally produced sustainable aviation fuels, renewable hydrocarbons and associated energy products could provide an additional layer of European strategic fuel security.

The same principle applies to sustainable propellants and other future fuel requirements: the strategic advantage is not simply that the carbon is renewable. It is that the energy resource is sustainable, locally producible, distributed and less dependent upon imported fossil supply chains.

That is the larger proposition.

TITAN begins with forest residue.
It creates biogenic carbon flexibility.
2G ethanol provides the bridge into AtJ SAF.
SAF East and SAF West provide the refining platform.
And ReFuelEU Aviation provides the market trajectory.

Europe has already decided that SAF consumption must grow.

The remaining question is who will build the sustainable feedstock and production infrastructure required to supply it.

This now gives us a clean foundation for Part 2: the emerging European 2G ethanol and AtJ SAF production landscape — and where the supply gap opens for TITAN, SAF East and SAF West.

PART 2 — EUROPE IS BUILDING SAF CAPACITY — BUT THE 2G FEEDSTOCK GAP REMAINS

Refinery Capacity Is Not the Same as Feedstock Capacity

Part 1 established the demand side.

Europe has legislated the SAF market through ReFuelEU Aviation. The next question is therefore straightforward:

Where will the fuel come from?

At first sight, the answer appears encouraging. SAF projects are being announced and developed across Europe. Existing refineries are being converted, HEFA capacity is expanding, Alcohol-to-Jet projects are emerging and major industrial groups are positioning for synthetic aviation fuels.

But refinery capacity alone does not solve the problem.

Every SAF pathway requires a sustainable source of carbon and energy upstream.

The strategic question is therefore not simply:

How many SAF refineries will Europe build?

It is:

What sustainable feedstocks will those refineries consume for the next 20–30 years?

This distinction is central to the Syngas Project strategy.

Europe Starts With HEFA

The first large wave of European SAF production is predominantly based upon HEFA — Hydroprocessed Esters and Fatty Acids.

HEFA is commercially mature and can use waste oils and fats such as used cooking oil and certain animal fats, as well as other eligible lipid feedstocks.

It is therefore entirely logical that HEFA leads the early SAF market.

Existing petroleum refining infrastructure can be adapted, the technology is proven, and a supply chain for lipid feedstocks already exists.

But HEFA does not create an unlimited feedstock resource.

Europe has finite quantities of genuinely sustainable waste oils and fats. As SAF demand rises, these materials are also sought by renewable diesel, road transport, maritime fuel and other industrial users.

The issue is therefore not whether HEFA works.

It works.

The issue is how far a finite lipid feedstock pool can carry an aviation market whose SAF obligation ultimately rises to 70%.

Europe will need additional pathways.

1G Ethanol Can Help — But It Does Not Solve the Advanced Feedstock Question

Europe and the wider Atlantic market already possess substantial first-generation ethanol production.

This provides an important potential feedstock base for Alcohol-to-Jet.

The emergence of commercial AtJ technology means that ethanol is no longer confined principally to petrol blending. It can become an intermediate for producing aviation hydrocarbons.

That is an important industrial development.

However, a distinction must remain between AtJ technology and the origin of the ethanol entering it.

Alcohol-to-Jet does not automatically mean second-generation SAF.

If the ethanol originates from conventional sugar or starch crops, the carbon pathway remains associated with first-generation agricultural production.

If the ethanol is produced from eligible wastes and lignocellulosic residues, the proposition changes fundamentally.

The same downstream AtJ refinery can therefore receive ethanol with very different upstream sustainability characteristics.

For Syngas Project, this is precisely where the opportunity begins.

The Scarce Product Is Not Simply Ethanol — It Is Scalable 2G Ethanol

Europe already knows how to make ethanol.

The more difficult industrial task is producing large, repeatable quantities of second-generation ethanol from non-food lignocellulosic resources.

Commercial cellulosic ethanol has proved difficult.

Several projects internationally have demonstrated the chemistry and biology but struggled with feedstock preparation, pretreatment complexity, enzyme cost, plant reliability, scale-up or overall economics.

That history is important.

It explains why announcements of advanced SAF capacity should not be confused with the existence of an equally mature upstream 2G ethanol industry.

There is a gap between the two.

AtJ technology is becoming commercial.
SAF demand is mandated.
But scalable European 2G ethanol supply remains comparatively thin.

That gap is where TITAN is positioned.

TITAN Approaches the Problem From the Gas Side

TITAN does not attempt to break lignocellulosic material directly into fermentable sugars.

Instead, the solid biomass is converted first.

The pathway is:

Forest Residue → Gasification → Hydrogen Producer Gas → Gas Cleaning → Targeted Microbial Fermentation → 2G Ethanol

This changes the feedstock problem.

Rather than asking biology to digest the complex physical structure of wood, TITAN first converts the material into gaseous molecules.

The microbial fermentation system then works on the cleaned producer gas.

The objective is therefore not to ferment the tree.

We ferment the carbon after the tree has been converted into gas.

This allows the upstream conversion platform to accept heterogeneous lignocellulosic residues while presenting the downstream microorganisms with a much more controlled gaseous feed.

It is an important distinction between TITAN and conventional cellulosic ethanol pathways.

The Emerging European AtJ Corridor

A second development is now becoming visible.

Europe is beginning to establish an Alcohol-to-Jet industrial corridorstretching from the North Sea into continental Europe.

Projects associated with AtJ development are emerging around major industrial and logistics centres including Teesside, Ghent and Dunkirk.

These locations are significant.

They sit within one of Europe’s most important industrial corridors, with access to ports, aviation-fuel logistics, existing refinery infrastructure, hydrogen development and the emerging North Sea PtX economy.

This creates an important strategic signal.

Europe is beginning to build downstream infrastructure capable of consuming alcohol as an aviation-fuel intermediate.

For Syngas Project, that is not competition with TITAN.

It can become a market.

Build TITAN First — Then Use the Market in Both Directions

The first Syngas Project objective remains clear:

Build TITAN One.

TITAN One establishes the commercial production platform, the forest-residue supply chain, O&M+Fuel system, operating data and bankable production history.

But the wider strategy does not require Syngas Project to wait until every TITAN required for SAF East or SAF West has been constructed.

As genuine 2G ethanol projects develop elsewhere in Europe, Syngas Project can potentially contract their output.

That creates a two-directional strategy.

TITAN can supply ethanol outward to emerging AtJ facilities while Syngas Project builds its market position.

Later, Syngas Project can bring contracted ethanol inward to SAF East and SAF West as its own refinery capacity develops.

The same commercial network therefore works in both directions.

Initially:

TITAN → European AtJ market

Later:

TITAN network + contracted European 2G ethanol → SAF East / SAF West

This allows the company to build an ethanol inventory and supplier network before the full refinery programme is complete.

From the Baltic to the Channel

The geographical opportunity is larger than Poland.

Syngas Project should view the emerging 2G ethanol market as a corridor extending approximately:

Baltic Region → Poland → Germany → Benelux → English Channel / North Sea

Within that corridor are forests, industrial centres, railways, ports, refineries, airports and some of Europe’s largest concentrations of future renewable hydrogen and PtX infrastructure.

TITAN’s location strategy fits naturally into this geography.

Eastern production can connect Poland and the Baltic region.

Western production can connect through Szczecin and the German industrial system towards the North Sea.

Rail and port infrastructure allow ethanol to move before dedicated refinery capacity exists.

The commercial objective is therefore larger than supplying one refinery from one plant.

It is to begin creating a 2G ethanol trading and supply position across Northern and Central Europe.

The Refinery Becomes the Hub

Once sufficient upstream production and contracted inventory exist, the logic reverses.

Instead of exporting ethanol to somebody else’s refinery, Syngas Project can bring ethanol into its own.

SAF East and SAF West then become regional conversion hubs.

Each refinery can combine:

Syngas Project TITAN production + associated TITAN production + contracted third-party compliant 2G ethanol.

This is important because refinery utilisation should not depend upon the commissioning date of one individual upstream plant.

A diversified supply portfolio reduces that dependency.

The model begins to resemble a conventional refinery supply system — but instead of crude oil arriving from global fossil resources, the refinery receives renewable alcohol produced from distributed biological carbon resources.

That is the transition we are positioning for.

TITAN at the Refinery Adds Another Layer of Security

The refinery itself does not need to be separated from the TITAN platform.

A TITAN located at the SAF refinery can provide a further layer of integration.

One production island can be configured around hydrogen and biogenic CO₂ production, while another provides dispatchable CHP and energy support.

Through variable Water-Gas Shift operation, the hydrogen-rich producer gas can be directed according to refinery requirements.

The refinery therefore gains access to:

biogenic hydrogen + biogenic CO₂ + renewable electricity + useful heat + operational energy resilience.

The TITAN platform is consequently present at both ends of the system.

Upstream TITAN facilities manufacture the 2G ethanol.

The refinery TITAN supports the conversion of that ethanol into SAF.

Offshore PtX and Onshore Biogenic Carbon Are Complementary

Europe is simultaneously making enormous investments in offshore wind, renewable hydrogen and Power-to-X.

That development should not be viewed as competing with TITAN.

The two systems face different physical constraints.

Offshore production is constrained principally by the wind that blows.

Onshore biogenic production is constrained principally by the carbon that grows.

Europe will need both.

PtX can provide renewable hydrogen and synthetic fuels where abundant renewable electricity is available.

Biogenic platforms can provide renewable carbon, alcohols, methane, hydrogen and dispatchable energy from biological residues.

When these systems meet around ports, refineries and industrial clusters, they become complementary.

The North Sea industrial corridor may therefore become one of the places where offshore renewable energy and onshore renewable carbon increasingly converge.

The Opportunity Is the Missing Middle

The European SAF market can therefore be viewed as three layers:

Upstream: sustainable carbon and ethanol production.

Midstream: aggregation, storage, logistics and trading.

Downstream: AtJ refining, blending and aviation-fuel distribution.

Large energy companies are naturally attracted to the downstream refinery and fuel-distribution layer.

Forestry organisations control significant parts of the upstream resource.

Between them sits an emerging space.

That is the missing middle.

Syngas Project intends to occupy that space by connecting distributed lignocellulosic carbon resources with industrial-scale SAF production.

TITAN creates the molecule.

The supply network aggregates the molecule.

SAF East and SAF West convert the molecule.

And Europe’s mandated aviation market consumes the final fuel.

The strategic sequence is therefore:

Forest Residue → TITAN → 2G Ethanol → Regional Aggregation → SAF Refinery → European Aviation

We do not need to build the entire European SAF market.

We need to establish a defensible position at the point where scarce sustainable biogenic carbon meets rapidly expanding refinery demand.

That is the opportunity.hydrogen/CO₂/CHP integration, and the East–West European logistics strategy.

PART 3 — SAF EAST + SAF WEST: WHERE ONSHORE CARBON MEETS OFFSHORE ENERGY

Now We Scale

Parts 1 and 2 established two facts.

Europe has created the SAF market through legislation.

Europe is building refining capacity, but scalable supplies of advanced biogenic carbon and 2G ethanol remain limited.

Part 3 is therefore about scale.

Syngas Project does not intend to remain simply an upstream producer of ethanol. The longer-term strategy is to connect distributed biogenic carbon production with renewable energy, hydrogen, logistics and Alcohol-to-Jet refining.

That is the purpose of SAF East and SAF West.

The concept begins with two refinery platforms:

The intention is not to build 2.4 million litres/day immediately.

The important point is to design the destination before building the road towards it.

TITAN One begins that road.

Start With the Molecule

At the centre of the refinery strategy is Alcohol-to-Jet.

The working Syngas Project design basis is approximately:

1.7 litres 2G ethanol → 1 litre SAF

At Phase 1 scale, one 600,000 L/day SAF refinery therefore requires approximately:

1.02 million litres/day of ethanol.

At 1.2 million L/day SAF, the requirement becomes approximately:

2.04 million litres/day of ethanol.

This immediately explains why Syngas Project cannot think about the refinery independently from its upstream supply system.

A large AtJ refinery is fundamentally a feedstock aggregation business as well as a processing business.

The refinery must be surrounded by an expanding portfolio of TITAN production, associated producers and contracted compliant 2G ethanol.

That is why we build the carbon position first.

Central Europe Has Done This Before

There is an important historical lesson here.

Central Europe has previously operated under conditions in which access to conventional petroleum could not be assumed.

Industry responded by examining everything available: coal, biomass, gases, alcohols, electricity, rail infrastructure, local production and substitute fuels.

The technologies belong to another era.

The systems thinking does not.

The lesson is not that Europe should recreate yesterday’s technology.

The lesson is that when a strategic resource becomes constrained, engineers stop asking which single technology will replace it and begin asking:

What resources do we have, and what can they become when we connect them?

BRAD has been developed with access to original historical technical and industrial documentation from that period.

We use those records not to reproduce the past, but to understand how engineers thought when energy, materials and logistics could no longer be taken for granted.

Today we possess resources they could scarcely have imagined.

The Future Scales Onshore and Offshore

Europe is building an extraordinary new energy resource offshore.

Wind.

Renewable electricity.

Hydrogen.

Power-to-X.

At the same time, another enormous resource exists onshore:

forest residues + agricultural residues + AD/biogas + solar + renewable electricity + recovered industrial energy + biogenic carbon.

These should not be treated as competing energy systems.

They are complementary.

Offshore is constrained by the wind that blows.

Onshore is constrained by the carbon that grows.

Neither resource needs to solve the entire problem alone.

A wind turbine does not have to make SAF by itself.

A solar farm does not have to operate a refinery by itself.

An anaerobic digestion plant does not have to decarbonise aviation.

A forest residue does not have to become only ethanol.

Hydrogen does not have to originate from one production route.

The industrial opportunity lies in connecting them.

Wind + Solar + AD/Biogas + Biogenic Carbon + Hydrogen + Storage + CHP + Heat Recovery + Grid + Rail + Ports + Refining

The individual technologies already exist.

It is time to become serious about what the sum of all the parts can become.

Syngas Project Was Designed for This

Syngas Project was never conceived around a single-product biomass plant.

TITAN was designed around a different principle.

Take a locally available carbon resource.

Convert it into a controllable intermediate.

Then decide what that resource should become.

That intermediate is Hydrogen Producer Gas — HPG.

The architecture therefore provides several pathways:

Forest Residue → HPG → 2G Ethanol

Forest Residue → HPG → Renewable Methane

Forest Residue → HPG → Hydrogen + Biogenic CO₂

Forest Residue → HPG → Dispatchable Electricity + Heat

Variable Water-Gas Shift provides another degree of control.

The plant can change the balance between producer gas directed towards engine duty and gas processed towards increased hydrogen production.

Targeted Microbial Fermentation adds another degree of flexibility by allowing the common upstream gas platform to support different biological conversion routes.

TITAN is therefore not simply an ethanol factory.

It is an onshore biogenic-carbon and energy conversion platform.

And that becomes particularly powerful when TITAN arrives at the refinery.

TITAN at the SAF Refinery

The Syngas Project refinery concept incorporates TITAN as part of the refinery energy architecture.

The working configuration contains two distinct TITAN functions.

Island One — Hydrogen + Biogenic CO₂

The first island is configured around hydrogen production.

HPG passes through variable Water-Gas Shift, allowing additional carbon monoxide to be converted with steam:

CO + H₂O → H₂ + CO₂

Hydrogen is recovered for refinery duty.

The associated CO₂ is biogenic and can be captured as a separate product stream.

The refinery therefore does not automatically need to depend entirely upon externally supplied hydrogen.

Island Two — Dedicated CHP

The second island provides dispatchable combined heat and power.

This gives the refinery an energy source that is not dependent upon the instantaneous availability of wind or solar electricity.

The two systems therefore perform different functions:

Island One → Molecules

Island Two → Energy

And because HPG production and Water-Gas Shift are controllable, the balance can respond to refinery requirements.

Swing — Do Not Waste the Resource

This flexibility becomes particularly important in a renewable-energy system.

When abundant low-cost renewable electricity is available, the refinery should use it.

When offshore wind is producing strongly, use it.

When solar production is available, use it.

When external renewable hydrogen is economically attractive, use it.

When AD or biogas resources are available locally, integrate them where technically and commercially appropriate.

But when those resources are constrained, TITAN remains available.

That changes the question from:

“Which energy technology powers the refinery?”

to:

“What is the best available energy combination now?”

The refinery is no longer designed around one answer.

It is designed to swing.

SAF East

SAF East is envisaged as the eastern anchor of the system.

Its natural supply territory includes Poland, the Baltic region and ultimately wider Central and Eastern European production.

Its strategic position is particularly interesting because this region combines:

large forest resources;

agricultural and biological resources;

rail infrastructure;

developing renewable electricity;

future hydrogen production;

and access to major Central European aviation markets.

The eastern system can aggregate 2G ethanol from TITAN facilities and qualifying third-party production and bring that inventory towards the refinery.

Rail becomes particularly important.

Instead of moving crude oil thousands of kilometres from a producing region to a refinery, the system moves renewable alcohol from distributed regional carbon resources towards a conversion hub.

SAF then enters conventional aviation-fuel logistics.

SAF West

SAF West performs the corresponding western function.

The western Polish position provides access towards Germany, Scandinavia, the Baltic and the North Sea industrial economy.

Szczecin and the wider western corridor offer something particularly important:

the point at which the onshore and offshore systems can meet.

To the east and south lies the biogenic resource.

To the north and west lies the rapidly expanding offshore renewable-energy economy.

Rail connects inland production.

Ports connect maritime infrastructure.

Electricity connects renewable generation.

Hydrogen infrastructure develops around industrial clusters.

And the refinery converts renewable alcohol into a globally fungible aviation fuel.

SAF West can therefore become much more than a refinery location.

It can become an interface between Europe’s renewable-carbon economy and its offshore renewable-energy economy.

The Refinery Is a Hub, Not an Island

The resulting architecture is deliberately broader than AtJ:

2G Ethanol Supply → AtJ → SAF + Renewable Diesel

TITAN → H₂ + Biogenic CO₂

TITAN → Dispatchable CHP

Offshore Wind → Renewable Electricity / Hydrogen

Solar → Renewable Electricity

AD/Biogas → Renewable Gas / Energy

Storage → Time Shifting

Grid → Import / Export / Balancing

Rail + Port → Feedstock and Product Logistics

Each component performs the task for which it is best suited.

The refinery sits at their intersection.

That is the important difference between simply constructing another SAF plant and creating a renewable-energy and biogenic-carbon platform around SAF production.

BRAD — Think Above the Individual Plant

BRAD belongs above this architecture.

A conventional control system asks:

What is happening inside this plant?

BRAD must increasingly ask:

What is happening across the system?

Forest-resource availability.

TITAN production.

Ethanol inventory.

Third-party ethanol supply.

AD and biogas availability.

Wind generation.

Solar generation.

Hydrogen availability.

Electricity price.

Heat demand.

Storage position.

Rail movements.

Refinery demand.

SAF inventory.

Maintenance status.

These are not separate subjects.

Together they determine how the overall system should operate.

BRAD’s historical knowledge provides a useful discipline: understand every available resource and never assume that yesterday’s primary supply will always remain available.

Modern data, automation and AI allow us to take that principle much further.

The future question becomes:

What resources are available?

What does the system need?

What should TITAN produce?

What should we buy?

What should we store?

What should we export?

And what combination creates the greatest value from the complete system?

From 600,000 Litres to European Scale

The first refinery island establishes the platform.

600,000 L/day SAF.

The second island doubles it.

1.2 million L/day SAF.

Replicate that architecture East and West and the ultimate installed design position becomes:

SAF East — 1.2 million L/day

SAF West — 1.2 million L/day

Combined — 2.4 million L/day

That scale cannot be supported by one forest, one TITAN, one wind farm or one ethanol producer.

Nor should it be.

It requires a network.

That is precisely the point.

The future scales onshore and offshore, connecting distributed resources into industrial hubs capable of producing fuels at refinery scale.

Syngas Project was designed for that world.

We begin with TITAN One because every large system needs a first operating asset.

But TITAN One is not the destination.

It establishes the technology, supply chain, O&M+Fuel structure, operating history and commercial platform from which the network can grow.

Then the pieces begin to connect:

Forest → TITAN → 2G Ethanol

Wind → Electricity → Hydrogen

AD → Renewable Gas

Rail → Aggregation

Port → Offshore Energy

SAF East + SAF West → Refining

BRAD → Integration

And finally:

European resources → European fuel → European aviation.

The previous century built its energy system around the movement of oil.

This century gives Europe the opportunity to build one around the intelligent integration of the resources it already possesses.